WATERBURY-DUXBURY SCHOOL DISTRICT

ANNUAL REPORT

 

Board Members: Dale Smeltzer (Chair), Susan Flynn, Dawn Poitras, Scott Rathke, Sherry Ziemke

 

2009-2010 PROPOSED BUDGET

 

The Board started its budget process in August, and has worked hard to consider student and school district needs, plus anticipate current and future fiscal impacts.  For the first time, budget parameters were set in advance relating to ÒPer Pupil SpendingÓ, which is what is most directly related to the property tax rates.  This meant considering the joint impacts of the actual Budget expenditures increase, total estimated Revenues, plus the slightly declining Number of (equalized) Pupils. 

 

Waterbury-Duxbury School District ÒPer Pupil SpendingÓ is currently the only one in WWSU that is below the state average, so the two-vote requirements of Act 68 do not apply.  However an important aspect of the BoardÕs budget process was anticipating where we would fall relative to state average in the future, especially taking into account what we expect to be much smaller fund balances in future years.  The parameters set by the Board were ones that in the low and middle range would likely continue to keep our Per Pupil Spending below state average over the next few years.

 

It was clear early on that due to declining pupils, a Òlevel serviceÓ budget would be needed as a base from which further reductions would then be considered.  This meant that the only increases in the budget would be from already negotiated staff salary increases, changes in special needs student services, and increases relating to fuel, energy or the transportation contract.  Our Administrators then provided several levels of expenditure reductions to consider beyond that, within the parameter range set. 

 

The net result of our careful process is this budget being proposed for voter approval, and it reflects the lowest end of the parameter range that was set by the Board.  It represents:

¬  An increase of 2.5% in Budget expenditures, well under any previous budget increases.

¬  An increase of 4.1% in Spending per Pupil, matching the inflationary increase provided by state statute, resulting in an exactly level impact on the base tax rate.

¬  Equalized tax rates are now reported separately for Waterbury-Duxbury and Harwood before proportional consolidation based on equalized pupils to calculate the final education tax rate for each town, and can be compared to the previous year. At the currently recommended $0.01 drop in the base rate, Waterbury-DuxburyÕs equalized rate is $1.173 compared to $1.186 last year, while HarwoodÕs equalized rate is $1.224 compared to $1.254 last year.

¬  Unfortunately, this translates into estimated increases in the final Homestead Tax Rate of 7.3% for Waterbury and 8.7% for Duxbury, at the currently recommended base tax rate (not yet formally approved; it does not include any of the changes proposed by the Governor or under discussion at the Legislature).  This is due to higher than statewide average property value increases in both communities, from the CLA (Common Level of Appraisal) that impacts all tax rates.

 

Changes included in the proposed budget, compared to last year, can be found later in this report in a table titled ÒChange in FY2009 to FY2010 Budgeted ExpensesÓ and the main details are briefly summarized below:

¬      Minor shifts in staffing positions to reflect priorities identified by administrators and the strategic plan, resulting in a net reduction of  0.3 Professional FTEÕs (reductions of 0.2 Preschool, 0.2 Music, 0.4 English Language Learning teachers; Addition of 0.5 PE/Health at TBPS) and a reduction of 0.35 FTE Support Staff (reduced 0.5 custodian, on school days only, at TBPS). 

¬      Savings in Special Education costs through a reduction of 2.0 FTE of Special Education Instructional Assistants (aides), due to changes in student needs plus modifications to service delivery through reduced reliance on aides.

¬      Due to the unusually large fund balance a one-time extra amount ($55,000) was added again this year to the Long Term Maintenance Reserve, on top of what was already planned (total is $75,000).  The vast majority of the fund balance is serving as extra revenue that reduces our tax rate, however, while putting some of this surplus aside for the future.

¬      A change in accounting method for interest income and expenses is causing a budget increase, but this is exactly offset by an identical increase in revenues. 

¬      Preschool pupils have increased slightly at our private preschool partnership sites, but these expenses are offset by the increase in our equalized pupils.

 

Note: For taxpayers paying based on income, the Income Rate varies by town; see budget details. Note: A majority of households in both our communities pay their education property taxes based on income. For information on income sensitivity eligibility, please check with the VT Department of Taxes.

 

OUR SCHOOL DISTRICT – THE PAST YEAR:  School Board Highlights from 2007-08

 

This past year, the Board continued to work toward its goals of furthering the Strategic Plan and its implementation, plus ensuring that budget development is a comprehensive process that thinks to the future in both the short and long term.  Our Strategic Plan is now beginning to guide efforts within our school district, and will soon be integrated with the state mandated Action Plan.  Our administrators have established and prioritized the Strategies and Progress Indicators that will further the three established goals (see school website – www.wdsdvt.org – for details of the Strategic Plan). 

The Board wishes to gratefully acknowledge the many years of dedicated service provided by retiring Crossett Brook Middle School Principal, Ken Page, who has been with our school district since the very beginning!  He was instrumental in bringing middle level education to our DistrictÕs students. He oversaw the planning, construction, and leadership of our middle school while also serving as the principal of Duxbury Elementary School.

A search is already in progress for a new CBMS Principal who will now also serve as a PreK-8 District Coordinator.  The Board decided to restructure district-wide responsibilities by delegating their oversight to one principal who will also serve as the main liaison to work with the School Board.  This does not add new responsibilities, but simply distributes the current ones more efficiently. There will still be a principal at TBPS plus an assistant principal in each school.  In addition, the Director of Curriculum at WWSU will be asked to exercise a more expansive leadership and collaborative role with both building principals to identify needs, develop programs, monitor progress, and evaluate success. 

Lastly, the Board would like to thank outgoing board member Susan Flynn, who has served for more than 7 years on the board and participated at the supervisory union level as well. 

 

Crossett Brook Middle School Highlights (by Ken Page)

 

Staff: Crossett Brook Middle School is now in its 12th year of operation, and we continue to hum along in spite of some challenges. The loss of our former Assistant Director of Maintenance, Everett Boyce, was felt by all of us. Everett served us well for nine years before he left due to illness. Six new teachers, six new instructional assistants, one new food service director and two new support staff have joined our ranks this year. Although it meant a lot of hiring, we know that new people energize an organization, and that is precisely what has happened this year.

Initiatives: We no longer offer separate classes in computer applications, opting instead to integrate technology instruction into the current subjects. Now, teachers work directly with the technology coordinator to design units that embed technology within the unit or project.  The reduction of family and consumer sciences to a 50% position caused us to revamp our offerings for our 7th and 8th grade students. Monthly professional development continues for our staff using the Wednesday early-release day structure. Our staff has mainly concentrated on math, writing and service learning. A revised master schedule, an electronic grading and reporting system, and a school-wide effort to target students not making adequate yearly progress were other efforts.

Other: Community and parent involvement remains high, and the building is heavily used for school and community events plus various sports programs.  We are delighted that our facilities are used and enjoyed by the community.

I have greatly enjoyed my 13 years in Waterbury and Duxbury and will remember these as the most rewarding in my 36 year career. Although I plan to retire from the principalship, I plan to still be involved in education in some capacity. I want to thank the school board, the staff, the parents, the community and, most of all, the students, for giving me the opportunity to create something new and special in the Waterbury and Duxbury communities.    

Thatcher Brook Primary School Highlights (by Don Schneider)

 

Professional Development: On our eight early release days, professional development is offered to collaborative groups of teachers primarily in the two areas of math and writing. All of our 1-4 grade level teachers are continuing to focus on writing and our Pre K-K teachers are working in the area of mathematics.

Collaborative Teams: We continue in our efforts to help all of our students to make Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP). Every week, teams of teachers get together to analyze student work and plan intervention strategies for those students not achieving the standard. Teachers group students and plan instructional approaches according to their specific needs. The purpose of these collaborative data groups is to move all students toward meeting standards. For those already meeting the standard; it is to extend their learning. Through a state grant, we have been fortunate to be able to hire a .30 math teacher to help with students not meeting math standards.

New Staff:  We had an unusually high number of new employees this year! We have a new third/fourth grade teacher, school counselor, special educator, tech assistant, and food service director. The positions of food service director and tech assistant are shared with Crossett Brook Middle School. We also hired five instructional assistants who replaced individuals who had moved to other places of employment.  Through a state grant, we have hired a part time health educator who is teaching the health curriculum to students in grades 1-4.

 

***Please note***: The Waterbury Duxbury STAFF LIST has been omitted from this report to save on printing costs. A complete staff list is available at both town clerksÕ offices as well as both schoolsÕ offices and on either of the schoolsÕ websites, tbps.org or cbmsonline.org.


Waterbury-Duxbury

School and Student Data

for the 2008-09 School Year

General Information

 

Average Class Size            2006-07     2007-08    2008-09

Kindergarten              13.0          12.8        15.4

Grades 1– 4              18.7          17.5        17.0

Grades 5 - 8              21.5          19.4        18.7

 

Total Enrollment          2006-07       2007-08       2008-09

Pre-K - gr. 4          404         394             388

Gr. 5 - gr. 8           322         291             281

 

Attendance Rate (2007-08)

TBPS  93.8%        CBMS  96.1%          Vermont    95.4% (2006-07)        

 

Length of School Year                         Length of School Day

Student Days              180          Kindergarten       3.5 hours

Teacher Days             190          Grades 1–8        6.5 hours

                                                 

Special Services   % of total enrollment           

Students with Individualized Educational Plans (IEPs)

 

 

2006-07

 

 

2007-08

 

 

2008-09

TBPS

14.9%

15.9%

15.5%

CBMS

14.0%

19.4%

16.0%

                                                 

Staff (by total FTE)*

 

2006-07

2007-08

2008-09

Professional Teachers

66.85

68.39

68.70

Instructional Assistants

24.65

23.63

27.52

Administrators

4.0

4.0

4.0

Support Staff

23.0

25.53

23.36

Data as of October 1st of each year    

 * Full-Time Equivalent defined as 35 hrs/wk

 

Professional TeachersÕ Salaries

 

2006-07 

2007-08

2008-09

Waterbury-Duxbury Average

$43,279

$45,626

$46,425

Vermont Average

$47,644

$49,521

N/A

 

Students eligible for Free or Reduced Lunch

TBPS  17.5%         CBMS  14.9%          Vermont   29% (2007-08)           

Other Washington West Communities

Fayston 9.2%  Waitsfield 16.1%  Moretown 12.1%  Warren 17.2%


STUDENT ASSESSMENT RESULTS

 

New England Common Assessment Program (NECAP) – 2007 Results

The NECAP grade level assessments are based on the Vermont Grade Level Expectations (GLE's). The NECAP incorporates the principles of Òuniversal designÓ, which make this assessment accessible to the greatest number of students and are given yearly.

 

The results of the 2007 New England Common Assessment Program (NECAP) showed that Crossett Brook Middle School and Thatcher Brook Primary School made Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) for the Òall studentsÓ category. However, we did not make adequate yearly progress in the areas of Math and Reading for students with disabilities for a third year. This target area specifically focuses on students with Individual Education Plans (IEP). The NECAP results mean that both CBMS and TBPS are identified as schools in need of improvement for students with disabilities. In addition, the schools did not make AYP for students considered to be of low Socio-Economic Status (SES) in the area of Reading and Math.

 

In response to this identification, CBMS and TBPS have received federal funding to help improve test scores for these two identified categories. With this funding, CBMS has hired a .30 teacher to provide direct, one-on-one services to targeted students who did not make AYP. TBPS has hired a .30 math tutor to allow the current Title 1 teacher to focus on providing service to specifically targeted students in the area of literacy. 

 

Teachers continue to analyze NECAP release task information to focus in on specific teaching points. These release tasks allow teachers to see the specific area where students had difficulty while taking the NECAP. Teachers also continue to develop new teaching strategies using differentiated instruction. Differentiated Instruction is a method of teaching that enables a teacher to provide for all learning styles in the classroom and results in higher student performance.

 

The Literacy Coordinator and the Math Coordinator for the Waterbury/Duxbury school district provide embedded professional development within classrooms. The results of these efforts both improve and change teaching techniques. In addition, administrators from the district have been attending monthly meetings sponsored by the State of Vermont. These meetings are being used as a way for schools to share ideas and strategies that they are using to improve student performance.

 

The results of the 2008 NECAP will be available in late January 2009.  These results will help to direct the Waterbury/Duxbury School District in their instructional practices in the coming school year.

The following assessments were given:

            Grade 3                         Reading and Math

            Grade 4             Reading and Math

            Grade 5             Reading, Writing and Math

            Grade 6             Reading and Math

            Grade 7             Reading and Math

            Grade 8             Reading, Writing and Math

 

Please refer to the following levels of achievement as you read the table showing the results for grades three through eight.

NOTE: Levels 3 and 4 are combined on the tables and graphs.

Level 4: Proficiency with Distinction

Level 3: Proficiency

 

ALSO: The standard assessment reporting format uses DISTRICT to refer to WWSU

 

New England Common Assessment Program 2007

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Math % Proficient and Above                                (Levels 3 & 4)

 

Reading % Proficient and Above                            (Levels 3 & 4)

 

Writing % Proficient and Above                                        (Levels 3 & 4)

Grades

School

District

State

 

Grades

School

District

State

 

Grades

School

District

State

3rd grade

76%

83%

68%

 

3rd grade

72%

79%

71%

 

 

 

 

 

4th grade

57%

69%

62%

 

4th grade

66%

75%

68%

 

 

 

 

 

5th grade

66%

73%

64%

 

5th grade

67%

72%

68%

 

5th grade

49%

68%

48%

6th grade

84%

88%

66%

 

6th grade

84%

85%

72%

 

 

 

 

 

7th grade

65%

71%

60%

 

7th grade

73%

75%

71%

 

 

 

 

 

8th grade

69%

71%

59%

 

8th grade

70%

77%

69%

 

8th grade

60%

55%

47%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

VERMONT DEVELOPMENTAL READING ASSESSMENT (DRA)

The Vermont DRA is an individually administered standards-based reading assessment given at the end of grade 2. It involves students reading and re-telling selected short books. The graph below illustrates the percentages of students meeting and exceeding the standard for the Thatcher Brook Primary School, WWSU and the State. As the graph indicates, ninety-one percent of second graders at Thatcher Brook met or exceeded the standard. Ninety-one percent of second graders at WWSU and eighty-four percent at the State level met or exceeded the standard for spring 2008. At the time of this printing, the State of Vermont has decided to stop the mandatory testing using the Developmental Reading Assessment at the end of second grade. Schools have been encouraged to take this testing on themselves or use another assessment for this grade level. Thatcher Brook has decided to continue with the same DRA assessment for another year. 

 

 

Assessment of Student Performance

The results reported above are one way to look at state performance data. For more information on student data, go to the state website www.state.vt.us/educ. There, you are given the opportunity to review data disaggregated by gender, free and reduced lunch, etc.